Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses in Observing Interaction - International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses in Observing Interaction: Misunderstandings, applications and proposals

References

Argyle M (1967) The psychology of interpersonal behavior. Armondsworth, England: Penguin.

Atkinson JM and Drew P (1979) Order in court. The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

Bakeman R (2000) Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis HT and Judd CM (eds) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, pp.138-159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bakeman R and Brownlee JR (1980) The strategic use of parallel play: A sequential analysis. Child Development 51: 873-878.

Bakeman R and Gnisci A (2005) Sequential observational methods. In Eid M and Dieneer E (eds) Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology, pp.127-140. Washington, DC: APA.

Bakeman R and Gottman JM (1997) Observing interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis 2^nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bakeman R and Quera V (1995a) Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin 118: 272-284.

Bakeman R and Quera V (1995b) Analyzing interaction. Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bakhtin M (1986) The problem of speech genres. In Emerson C and Holquist M (eds) Speech genres and other late essay. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bales RF (1950) Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bavelas JB, Black A, Chovil N and Mullett J (1990) Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bearison DJ and Dorval B (with LeBlanc G, Sadow A and Plesa D and Commentary by Stetsenko A) (2001) Collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing. Westport, CN: Ablex.

Billig M (1999) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse and Society 10: 543-558.

Brown P and Levinson SC (1978) Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody E (ed) Questions and politeness, pp.56-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown P and Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some universal in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bull P (1994) On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 115-131.

Bull P (2002) Communication under the microscope. The theory and the practice of microanalysis. London: Routledge.

Bull P (2003) The microanalysis of political communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge.

Bull P and Elliott J (1998) Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17: 220-244.

Bull P and Mayer K (1993) How not to answer questions in political interview. Political Psychology 4: 651-666.

Bull P, Elliott J, Palmer D and Walker L (1996) Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology 35: 267-284.

Church KW and Helfman JI (1993) Dotplot: A program for exploring self-similarity in millions of lines of text and code. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2(2): 153-174.

Dawson TL, Fisher KW and Stein Z (2006) Reconsidering qualitative and quantitative research approaches: A cognitive developmental perspective. New Ideas in Psychology 24: 229-239.

Drew P and Heritage J (1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P Drew and J Heritage (eds) Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings, pp.3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eckmann JP, Kamphorst SO and Ruelle D (1987) Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhysics Letters 5: 973-977.

Edwards D and Potter J (1992) Discursive psychology. London: SAGE.

Edwards D and Potter J (1993) Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review 100: 23-41.

Edwards D and Potter J (1999) Language and causal attribution: A rejoinder to Schmid and Fiedler. Theory and Psychology 9: 823-836.

Eid M and Diener E (2006) Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gnisci A (2005) Sequential strategies of accommodation: A new method in courtroom. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4): 621-643.

Gnisci A (2008) Coercive and face-threatening questions to left-wing and right-wing politicians during two Italian broadcasts: Conversational indexes of par conditio for democracy systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(5) (in press).

Gnisci A and Bakeman R (2007) Sequential accommodation of turn taking and turn length: A study of courtroom interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(26): 234-259.

Goffman E (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18: 213-31. Reprinted in (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior, pp.5-45. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

Goffman E (1971) Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order. London: Penguin Press.

Goodwin C and Duranti A (eds) (1992) Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gottman JM (1979) Marital interaction. Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Gottman JM (1983) How children becomes friends. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48(3).

Harré R (1979) Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harré R and Gillett G (1994) The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Harré R and Secord P (1972) The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.

Heyns RW and Lippitt R (1954) Systematic observational techniques. In Handbook of social psychology. Theory and method (chap 10) Vol 1. London: Addison-Wesley.

Jacobs JK, Kawanaba T and Stigler JW (1999) Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research 31: 717-724.

Jefferson G (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Atkinson JM and Heritage JC (eds) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, pp.347-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jefferson G (1985) On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss'. Language and Society 14: 435-466.

Jucker J (1986) News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Gieben.

Kendon A (1982) Organization of behaviour in face to face interaction. In Scherer KR and Ekman P (eds) Handbook of methods in nonverbal behaviour research 26: 22-63.

Lewin K (1938) The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Contributions to Psychological Theory 1.

Lewin K (1944) Constructs in psychology and psychological ecology. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare 20: 17-21.

Linell P, Gustavsson L and Juvonen P (1988) Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of iniziative-response analysis. Linguistic 26: 415-142.

Mey I (2001) The CA/CDA controversy. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 609-615.

Muntigl P and Turnbull W (1998) Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 225-256.

O'Barr WM and Lind EA (1981) Ethnography and experimentation-Partners in legal research. In Sales BD (ed) Perspectives in law and psychology: The trial process, pp.181-208. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

O'Barr WM (1982) Linguistic evidence: Language power and strategy in the courtroom. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Parten MB (1932) Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27: 243-269.

Peräkylä A (2004) Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43: 1-20.

Psathas G (1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Psathas G and Anderson T (1990) The ‘practices' of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica 78: 75-99.

Quera V (2008) RAP: A computer program for exploring similarities in behavior sequences using random projections. Behavior Research Methods 40: 21-32.

Quera V, Bakeman R and Gnisci A (2007) Observer agreement for event sequences: Methods and software for sequence alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods 39: 39-49.

Reis HT and Judd CM (Eds) (2000) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roger DB, Bull PE and Smith S (1988) The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7: 27-34.

Rosenblum L (1978) The creation of a behavioral taxonomy. In Sackets GP (ed) Observing behavior 2: Data collection and analysis methods, pp.15-24. Baltimore: University Park Press.

Sacks H, Schegloff E and Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 4: 696-735.

Schegloff EA (1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 99-128.

Schegloff EA (1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8: 165-187.

Semin GR and Fiedler K (1988) The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 558-568.

Semin GR and Fiedler K (1991) The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In Stroebe W and Hewstone M (eds) European Review of Social Psychology 2: 1-50.

Smith ML (1994) Qualitative plus/versus quantitative: The last word. In Reichardt CS and Rallis SF (eds) The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives, pp.37-44. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Smith PK (1978) A longitudinal study of social participation in preschool children: Solitary and parallel play reexamined. Developmental Psychology 14: 517-523.

Stevens SS (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677-680.